Thus it is clear that non completion of hearing of this appeal is solely attributable to revenue. In these circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that there is no change in facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, we extend the stay for a period of six months or till the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier.
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s rulings in Amit Jalan vs ACIT cases, covering issues like notional rent for vacant flats and municipal ratable values.
Ocwen Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) During the previous year relevant to assessment year, the assessee had spent on buy-back of shares and debited the same to Profit & Loss account. The expenditure was disallowed by the AO in his draft assessment order holding the same to be capital expenditure. Hon’ble High […]
Kamal Kishore Mukati Vs PCIT (ITAT Indore) The facts in brief are that the assessee entered into an agreement in March 2006 for sale of agricultural land used for agricultural purpose. He received sale consideration in parts through banking channels. Sale deed was finally registered between March 2006 and April 2008. Before registering the sale […]
Qantas Airways Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 194C TDS deductible on Payment for use of lounge facilities by passengers A payment for the use of lounge facilities by the passengers, in our considered view, is clearly in the nature of payment for the use of certain facilities for the passengers. What passenger gets by […]
Raj Veer Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We are of the considered view that no doubt provisions contained u/s 234E under which late fee has been levied for defaults of period in filing the TDS/TCS statements/returns but coordinate Benches of the Tribunal have followed one approach, though there are conflicting decisions of different High Courts […]
Sujit Majumdar Vs ITO (ITAT Allahabad) The issue before us is within narrow compass and concerns itself with the allowability of deduction u/s 48 towards cost of improvement with respect to amount paid by the assessee towards his share towards conversion of aforesaid property from leasehold to freehold. We have also carefully gone through the […]
If the assessee by mistake has wrongly registered itself under a wrong category that does not mean that the said mistake is not curable or that the assessee is to be punished for its bona fide mistake
No action appears to have been taken in the preceding assessment year treating the purchase of the shares as bogus. Therefore, once such bogus purchase is sold then the entire amount, in my opinion, cannot be added u/s 68 of the IT Act, 1961.
Addl. CIT Vs Jatinder Mehra (ITAT Delhi) It is apparent that assessee does not own any share capital in case of Watergate advisors Limited as well as it also does not controls the above company as he does not have any shareholding or management rights in that With respect to the mention of the name […]
