Esteem Finventures Limited (Now Kapedome Enterprises Limited) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT is of considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition by stretching too far the rules of prudence. The Ld. AO himself observed in the order that the services engaged were from top most legal professionals. If that was the view […]
B. Braun Medical (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT deletes Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment as TPO adopts Wrong Gross Profit (GP) Margin of Comparable Company The assessee raised an additional ground before the Ld. DRP stating that the gross profit margin of ADS Diagnostics Ltd., had been wrongly worked out by the Ld. […]
Jeen Mata Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) The ld. AR of the assessee argued that merely there is a difference in the 26AS and the books results, there cannot be an addition to returned income the books of account of the assessee duly audited. AO has not found any single defect in the […]
TPO/AO cannot apply wrong method in the absence of material ie: audited financials of AE. More so, TPO/AO cannot even give the benefit as well to assessee for non cooperation for providing the audited financials of AE.
Revenue cannot make the additions under Section 69A for the reason that assessee has not cooperated with the department.
Corrtech International Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of Service Tax on the ground that the said demand was related to earlier years and the said Service Tax liability of the assessee or the recipient was on that point of time disputed by the parties. The Assessing Officer has […]
Penalty under Section 271E is not permissible in the absence of regular assessment framed against the assessee by the Revenue.
Advances rent during the course of opening of showroom were given in the course of business by assessee and for the purpose of commercial expediency. Therefore, forfeiture of the same by the concerned party had rightly claimed by assesseee as business loss.
K. V. Sridhar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Sec.56(2)(vii)(a) of Income tAx Act will apply only when any sum of money is received, without consideration, the aggregate value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees. Admittedly, the assessee received the sum of Rs.1.60 Crores for giving up his rights over some of the items of the suit […]
Imran Mohammed Iqbal Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Considering the above facts, vis-à-vis the outstanding balance relating to M/s. Prakash Gold amounting to Rs. 12,05,026/-, the addition having been made finding it to be bogus, since the consistent finding of fact is that the transaction was entered into by the assessee with the said party not […]
