No mala fide can be inferred where assessee is nursing such huge losses at its disposal. ITAT find that mitigating circumstances exists to exonerate assessee from clutches of penalty under Section 271(1)(b)
ITAT Delhi held that Reopening not allowable to disallow prior period expenses which were duly disclosed during original Assessment in Financial Statements and Tax Audit report
Difference between MRP & price sold to Stockists, by no stretch of imagination, can be considered as commission or brokerage paid by assessee to its Stockists to attract section 194H TDS.
Jindal Steel & Power Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts in brief are that the assessing officer has, in the assessment order, while holding the impugned subsidy as revenue receipt, simultaneously reduced the same from cost of fixed assets, while applying provisions of Explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the Act resulting in double […]
Electra Paper and Board Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case undisputedly on the date of allotment of shares i.e. 31.3.2016, a balance-sheet was drawn by the assessee albeit the said balance sheet was unaudited on that date. The FMV of the shares was determined on the basis of said balance-sheet. The […]
Grant Thornton Advisory (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: No TDS was to be deducted under section 195 on payment made by assessee to GTIL, UK towards membership and subscription fee as the relationship between GTIL, UK and its members would be governed by the principle of mutuality, hence, would not be taxable. Held: […]
ITO Vs Nithyasudha Combines (ITAT Chennai) The next point for consideration is whether the unexplained partners’ capital is assessable in the hands of the assessee or not in terms of section 68 of the Act. Section 68 of the Act can be invoked only when there is a credit in the books of account maintained by the […]
Marriott International Inc Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The only issue involved in this appeal is that income of royalty arising out of the above trademark of ‘brand’ Marriott’ is taxable in the hands of the assessee or not. Now, assessee has given a registration certificate dated 21st august, 2006 and covers above assessment years. No […]
KRBL Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) During the course of assessment proceedings, the appellant submitted that the cash purchases were made by it from Mandi Samitis located across UP from farmers and hence did not fall under the ambit of the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act, as the same were covered by Rule […]
DCIT Vs IFCI (ITAT Delhi) Issue- On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made on depreciation of finance leased assets amounting to Rs. 1,31,63,444/- holding that it is one of the business of assessee. Held- Depreciation of finance least assets is related to the […]
