Dr. Kalpana Alexander Vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) There is nothing to contradict the opinion of the learned PCIT that there is failure on the part of the learned Assessing Officer to make the minimum enquiry, let alone sufficient enquiry on this aspect. Assessment order held erroneous. Facts- The assessee is an individual, and a medical […]
Bagadia Properties Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It cannot be always presumed that the loans given to subsidiary companies are for business purposes. It is required to be proved that the subsidiary company has used the interest free loans for some business purposes. Facts- The assessee is undertaking the business of real estate development […]
Shaheed Bhagat Singh Educational Society Vs CIT(Exemption) (ITAT Amritsar) It is not obligatory for the assessee for maintain dissolution clause which will not be the issue for rejection of registration u/s 12A of the Act. Accordingly the registration U/s 12A could not be denied to the assessee-society for non maintain the dissolution clause. Facts- The […]
ACIT Vs Sanjay Agrawal (ITAT Raipur) Insignificant mistakes in the accounts cannot justify rejection of books of accounts of the assessee under Sec. 145(3) of the Act. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s. 143(2). Accordingly, A.O directed the assessee to substantiate its claim for deduction of expenses under the […]
Suvidha Fashions Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) The repairs of small modification carried out at the premises are small scale repair which cannot be classified with capital expenditure. Facts- The appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the business of embroidery job work. During assessment, AO noted that assessee has shown purchases of GPO cloth of […]
DCIT Vs Credit Suisse (Singapore) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee conducts portfolio investments in Indian securities in its capacity as SEBI registered FII/FPI, conclusion of the learned CIT(A) that the offshore distribution commission income is in th nature of ‘business income’ of the assessee does not require any interference. Facts- The assessee is a company […]
Dy.CIT Vs Sembcorp Energy India Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) Applicability of section 56(2)(viib) is only in a case where the shares are issued at a premium by a company in which public are not substantially interested. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, it was craved before AO that price at which the shares were issued […]
Zeeshan Azizmohmed Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Both SEBI and BSE corroborated the fact that Kailash Auto Finance Ltd was not a genuine company – LTCG exemption u/s 10(38) denied – addition u/s 68 sustained Facts- The assessee is an individual and is engaged in the business of trading in paper. The assessee filed its […]
Arcil CPS 002 XIII Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee trust is a Revocable Trust and contribution by beneficiaries is a revocable transfer. Hence, the income shall be taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries. Facts- The assessee is an AOP in the nature of trust in the business of securitization of debts and processing […]
J & K Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Amritsar) No disallowance can be made that the payment to the employee’s contribution to PF and ESI paid by the assessee before the due date of filing of return of income u/s. 139(1). Accordingly, we hold that no disallowance can be made in the assessment […]
