Rohan Pereria Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal raised through various grounds of appeal relates to the allowance of expenditure claimed as development expenditure on sale of land situated at Baner, Pune while computing the capital gains on the sale of said land. On careful perusal of the order of the […]
Jagubhai Chhaganbhai Patel Vs I.T.O (ITAT Surat) In this cases in quantum appeals assessee was granted substantial relief in deleting major part of additions and only part of capital gains only on account of cost of improvement on pucca structure was partly upheld on estimation basis. Therefore, all substantial additions were either deleted or upheld […]
Bhalchandra Educational Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Lucknow) CBDT vide Circular No. 7/2018 dated 20/12/2018 has issued directions for condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act in filing of Form 10 and Form 9A for assessment year 2016-17. The analysis of directions of CBDT vide this circular reveals that since assessment year 2016-17 was the […]
Hiralaxmi Ishwarlal Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT noted that the assessee already disclosed the bogus long term capital gain claim on sale of penny stock shares under income disclosure scheme. The sum so disclosed was Rs. 16,20,156/-. The cost of these shares was Rs. 30,673/- which was a component of the total sale proceeds […]
Rajesh Vitthal Badade Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) It is found as an admitted position that the AO recorded statement of Mr. Sampat G. Mandhare and Mrs. Dropadabai Fakirrao Harpale, who had given sum of Rs. 5.00 lakh and Rs.7.00 lakh respectively to the assessee as advance for purchase of the land. Here it is relevant […]
ITAT held that where loans and advances are given in normal course of business and transaction in question benefits both payer and payee companies, provisions of section 2(22)(e) cannot be invoked.
.In the reason for delay in filing the appeal the appellant has stated that Advocate was busy in filing the GST returns and forgot to file the said appeal.
ITAT held that loss from trading in commodity derivatives is not a speculative loss and rightly been set off by the assessee against regular business profits from medical derivatives business.
ITAT imposes cost of Rs.25,000 for lackadaisical and non co-operative attitude of the assessee towards the quantum proceedings
Assessee did not appear on the date of hearing and did not furnish any application stating any reasonable cause for not appearing on the given date nor requested any adjournment. Thus, there is a clear violation of provision of Section 131 of the Act and penalty u/s 272A(1)(C) of the Act is attracted.
