South West Pinnacle Exploration Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Rectification under section 154 of the Act can only be made when glaring mistake of fact or law has been committed by the officer passing the order becomes apparent from the record. Rectification is not possible if the question is debatable. Moreover, the point which was […]
If very initiation of penalty proceedings on a defective notice is invalid and it do not warrant imposition of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee.
GSR Ventures Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Once any TDS is effected in accordance with the provisions of the Act and paid to the Central Government, such an amount shall be treated as a payment of tax on behalf of the person from whose income the deduction was made, and, therefore, a credit of […]
Bistro Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Disallowance of Rs.4,00,000/- was made by the AO on adhoc basis on the ground that the amounts claimed under the expenses are neither fully vouched nor fully verifiable, so it cannot be said that the same are wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of business. The […]
Addition for difference in Share of profit from Partnership due to Mistake in lowering the profit in revised Return same not sustainable
Income from Sale of Shares treated as Business Income as Assessee himself treated the same as Business Income in earlier & Subsequent years
Praveen Kumar Chauhan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Revenue submitted that the assessee failed to explain the source of cash deposits. The only contention of the assessee before the authorities below was that the amount was received as a gift from his father. He submitted that the assessee has merely filed an affidavit. However, creditworthiness of […]
ITAT held considering the practical difficulties involved in furnishing the segmental details of AE transactions and non-AE transactions, penalty under Sec. 271G could not be justifiably imposed.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds disallowance of Amay Pharma’s expenditure on gifts to doctors. Setback on c/f loss setoff. Latest SC ruling cited.
Held that tribunal in assessee’s co-owner case has taken holistic view in adoption of fair market value as DVO has himself stated in his report that the impugned land was situated at a more appropriate location as compared to sale instances considered by him.
