Legislature has nowhere incorporated that the lands re-purchased in section 54B deduction claim have to be agricultural on re-investment date
Appeal dismissed for technical lapse as Legal heir did not register himself as representative assessee along with PAN of deceased assessee
ITAT not agreed with Conclusion that whatever income was shown in Form 26AS under assess’s PAN is his income
Asessee has failed to appear on 8 occasions before the ld. CIT(A). Conduct of assessee is clogging justice delivery system. Hence, ITAT directed the assessee to pay Rs.10,000/- to Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund
Held that provision of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) cannot be invoked unless the recipient of loan is a shareholder of the company. If recipient of loan is not shareholder in a company from which loan is received, such loan cannot be assessed as deemed divided.
Held that payment of federal taxes on the different between FMV and the grant price establishes that assessee is paying tax treating the value of shares as perquisite. Accordingly, provisions of section 49(2AA) are applicable. Cost of acquisition of share cannot be FMV.
Held that principle of res judicata is not applicable to decision of revenue authorities and, therefore, decisions given in an assessment for an earlier year are not binding either on assessee or on department in a subsequent year.
Held that a domestic transaction of purchase from the related party is not required to be considered as a specified domestic transaction under section 92BA.
Held that the assessee entered into forex derivative transaction with the ICICI Bank to hedge the foreign currency risk involved in the transaction. Thus, expenses claimed were revenue in nature as the derivative transaction entered into by the assesse was not in the nature of speculative transaction.
Held that fees like entrance fees as well as life membership are part of the corpus fund and accordingly are in the nature of capital receipt.
