Simply rejecting on a technical ground amounts to denial of principles of natural justice to the assessee. Therefore, we are remanding back the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for proper adjudication on merit.
ITAT Rajkot held that dividend income and interest earned on surplus held with cooperative bank would be eligible for deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Rajkot held that service of notice to the last known address of the assessee cannot be held as invalid service of notice as assessee has left the place to unknown location without informing anyone.
Exemption otherwise available to the assessee trust under section 11 cannot be denied merely on account of delay in furnishing of audit report in form 10B as required under section 12A(b) of the Act.
Janki Vaishali Co-operative Housing Society Limited Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, assessee filed return of income on 24/12/2018 i.e. beyond the due date for filing return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act for the Assessment Year 201819. The solitary reason for denying benefit of deduction u/s 80P of the Act is that the […]
Ashoka Palace Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The issue whether interest income derived from deposits with cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act or not has been considered by Tribunal in catena of decisions. The Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Co-op Society […]
Parvez Peerpasha Inamdar Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the only reason taken note of by the ld. PCIT for revising the assessment order is that the assessee had deposited Rs.92.25 lakh in his savings bank account which was not properly examined by the AO. The assessee categorically submitted before the AO that […]
The assessee pleaded a reasonable cause before the AO that the audit could not be carried out because of ill-health of his wife, which further worsened the family problems. Section 271B is subject to provisions of section 273B which provides that in case of a reasonable cause, penalty under the concerned section need not be imposed.
Hitesh Manshukhbahi Dave Vs JCIT (ITAT Rajkot) Gujarat High Court in the case of Dr. Rajaram L. Akhaniv ITO [2017] 88 taxmann.com 693 (Gujarat) has held that where assessee had accepted a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs from his son to meet urgent requirement of depositing margin money in bank account for buying a vehicle […]
Jet Airways (India) Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) According to the provisions of Section 140(c) of The Income Tax Act, in case of a company which has been referred to the insolvency resolution process of the insolvency and bankruptcy code, 2013 (31 of 2016) the return be verified by the insolvency resolution professional appointed by […]
