The assignment of debt in favor of another entity partly in exchange of land was integral part of the business activities of the assessee and any gain / loss arising on such an asset should be viewed as business profits only.
Lakshmanan Indirani Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee was subjected to search action u/s 132 on 08-9-2015. During search operations, the jewellery belonging to the assessee and her family members was found. The jewellery weighed 3574.590 Grams which was valued at Rs.85.78 Lacs. In statement u/s 132(4), the assessee submitted that the jewellery belonged to […]
Dashrathbhai Shivabhai Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The assessee is engaged in farming and trading of milk and seeds. As per the information made available, the assessee made cash deposit of Rs. 21,95,000/- with Saving Bank Account. Being agricultural and the agricultural income is exempt the assessee did not file any return of income under […]
In this case employee’s contribution to PF was not deposited before due date mentioned in Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Hence, impugned amount has been rightly disallowed by AO.
Assessing Officer is directed to tax interest on income tax refund under Article 11(2) of India- Malaysia DTAA and not as Business Income
DCIT Vs Crystal Glaze (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT considered judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in case of Zirconia Cera Tech Glazes vs. DCIT wherein addition was made only on basis of show cause notice issued by Excise Department against assessee alleging that assessee was engaged in undervaluation of sales and clandestine removal of goods and […]
ITAT held that matter relating to wages/labour expenses which was not subject matter of limited scrutiny cannot be raised in revisionary proceedings u/s 263 for the first time.
Motiprabha Infrated Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (ITAT Patna) Undisputedly, minimum statutory period of 30 days mandated under the provisions of Section 74(A) of CGST/BGST Act, 2017 was not afforded to the petitioner for making payment due and prior to the expiry of 30 days, the assessing officer proceeded to pass the order, ex […]
Appellant has been able to establish that income by way of Design Charges are in the nature of business income as the same are inherently connected with the business of export of jewellery undertaken by Unit-II of the Appellant, and therefore, the same must be included in business income for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 10A of the Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest on deposits kept with scheduled banks only the net interest i.e. the interest income reduced by the administrative expenses and other proportionate expenditure to earn the said income had to be brought to tax u/s 56 of the I.T. Act.
