Analysis of a significant case – Manohar Lal Sarraf and Sons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr. CIT, where ITAT Delhi overturned a revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of jurisdiction. Dive into the details of the ruling
ITAT Delhi partially approves the appeal by the assessee in Sudha Vs ITO, eliminating additional cash deposit sourced from past savings and agricultural activities.
In Raunika Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) case, ITAT clarifies that Section 41(1) cannot be invoked when trading liabilities have not been written back in books of accounts.
ITAT Delhi’s ruling on Sentinel Consultants P. Ltd. vs ACIT addresses the due dates for PF-ESI contributions, aligning with the ESIC & PF Act over the Income Tax Act’s Mercantile System, impacting the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20.
An in-depth look at the ITAT Dehradun ruling in Saraswati Dynamics Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT, highlighting the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. Explore how the tribunal’s decision impacts tax jurisprudence
Discover the intricacies of the ITAT Pune’s recent decision in Vashi Parivaar Foundation Vs Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), highlighting the importance of proving the genuineness of charitable activities for gaining tax exemption.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable.
ITAT Pune held that the deduction u/s 36(1)(va) in respect of employee’s contribution not entitled on failure to deposit employee’s contribution before due date prescribed under the relevant statutes.
ITAT Surat held that assessee is not required to get his books of accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act as capital gain, short term or long term, doesn’t form part of turnover. Accordingly, penalty under section 271B not leviable.
ITAT Amritsar held that in case of non-cooperation during conduct of special audit under section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, the time limit to do the same can be extended at the end of the department.
