ITAT Mumbai held that the benefit under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act is also available in respect of expenditure on clinical trials outside the approved in-house R&D facility.
ITAT Delhi held that as lower authority made ex-parte addition towards unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act matter restored to CIT(A) for denovo adjudication giving last opportunity to assessee to explain source of investment.
ITAT Pune held that the excess income declared during the course of survey proceedings cannot be treated as unexplained income, but, the same is treated as business income.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order in the case of DCIT vs. Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling on the necessity of proper service for Income Tax notices. An in-depth analysis of Sandeep Kumar vs. ITO case. Learn more.
ITAT Delhi’s ruling on disallowing business expenses under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Analysis of Giri Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT case. Learn more.
Explore the ITAT Amritsar’s order in the case of Smt. Bharti Singh vs. DCIT, involving a remand for accurate fact-finding after negligent appeal dismissal.
Explore the ITAT Amritsar order in the case of Smt. Bharti Singh vs. ACIT, covering reassessment jurisdiction, reasons, and legal implications.
ITAT Amritsar held that excess stock found during the survey only be treated as income under the head business income and not as deemed income under section 69B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chennai held that income from listed shares and securities which had been treated as stock in trade by assessee is taxable under the head income from business and profession and not under the head capital gain.
