ITAT Mumbai held that with regard to addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act it is directed to set the matter back to AO to verify whether the source for the additions made in the hands of the assessee is explained through the settlement made before the settlement commission.
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as non-declaration of interest on income tax refund was bona fide and cannot be said to be underreporting of income.
Explore the case of ACIT (TDS) Vs Victor Hospitals & Medical Services Limited, where the ITAT Panaji determined TDS under Section 194J for consultant doctors.”
In case of Maharaja Ganga Mahal vs. ITO (TDS) in ITAT Delhi, where TDS exemption was claimed for interest payments to AU Financiers. Learn outcome and implications
In an ex-parte order due to non-attendance, ITAT remits the case of Ravi Prakash Sharma vs. ITO back to the Assessing Officer. Get the full text of the order here.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that corpus donations are capital in nature and hence cannot be added to the income of the assessee and hence not taxable.
ITAT Bangalore held that the payments made to gateway providers are not brokerage and TDS u/s. 194H of the Income Tax Act is not liable to be deducted.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act treating share application money from undisclosed source unsustainable as burden duly discharged by filing confirmation, affidavit, copy of income tax return and bank statement of respective parties.
In case of Prtatap Singh Yadav Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) assessment order was declared invalid due to non-compliance with CBDT Circular No.19/2019.
Read detailed analysis of the case Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) where ITAT declared DRP directions invalid due to missing DIN.
