In the Ravindra R.V. vs. DCIT case, ITAT Bangalore remits the denial of HRA exemption under Section 10(13A) back to the AO for reconsideration due to lack of salary breakup.
ITAT Mumbai held that order passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act by merely remitting the matter back to AO without giving a finding that profit declared by assessee is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is liable to be set-aside.
In the Sonam Rajesh Rateria vs. ITO case, ITAT orders re-adjudication due to non-consideration of the Assessee’s unsigned reply to a notice under section 147.
Learn how non-acquaintance with new e-mail notice procedures led to the denial of opportunity to the assessee in the Venugopal Reddy Yeravally vs. ITO case, as ITAT Hyderabad sets aside the ex-parte order.
In the cases related to Sunder Lal vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13, the ITAT directs re-adjudication due to lack of effective representation and challenges to additions.
In the case of Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. ACIT, ITAT Delhi rules that no disallowance can be made for delay in EPF payment due to technical issues.
In the case of J.R. Rice India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, ITAT Delhi removes Income Tax addition under section 68 for cash deposits during demonetization, citing no abnormal sales.
Assessee has appealed against an order passed by CIT(A) and subsequent addition. Learn more about Capital Gain cannot be treated as bogus without giving reasons.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act to be restricted to the borrowed amount which is not used for business purpose.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessee failed to produce books of account before AO as well as before CIT(A). Books were produced before Tribunal. Accordingly, matter restored back to AO with direction to consider the documents produced and adjudicate the issue accordingly.
