Withholding of refund claims should be examined by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax with due application of mind and the entire exercise should be completed within the period of six weeks and the case of failure of Officers should transmit the amount including the interest to assessee without awaiting any further orders.
Choe Jae Won Vs Principal Secretary to the Government (Madras High Court) Finding justification in the plea made by the learned Government Pleader and considering the fact that, several Non-Bailable Warrants have already been issued to the Petitioners and that, there is every possibility of the Petitioners fleeing away from the clutches of Law, this […]
The courts are given an extremely limited power of judicial review into the resolution plan duly approved by the COC. Therefore, the issuing of notices by Goods and Service Tax (GST) Department of Rajasthan for all the old unpaid dues of Binani Cement would be acting in a totally illegal and arbitrary manner and the demand notices were ex-facie illegal, arbitrary and per-se and could not be sustained.
Paradigm Geophysical Pty Ltd. Vs CIT (Delhi High Court) After 01.04.2011, income falling within the scope of Section 44DA (1) of the Act would be excluded from the scope of Section 44BB of the If the income of a non-resident is in the nature of fees for technical services or royalty, it shall be taxable […]
Housing And Urban Development Corporation ltd Vs Add. CIT (Delhi High Court) The pay revision of employees of the appellant, a PSU is due every ten years with the expiry of one wage settlement or agreement. Invariably, there is a time lag between expiry of a wage revision and negotiation of a fresh wage revision. […]
All interim orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad as well as at Lucknow, all the District Courts, Civil Courts,Family Courts, Labour Courts, Industrial Tribunals and all other Tribunals in the State over which this Court has power of superintendence, which have been expired subsequent to 19th March, 2020 or are due to expire within a period of one month from today, will continue to operate upto 26th April, 2020. We, however, make it clear that those interim orders which are not of a limited duration and are to operate till further orders will remain unaffected;
All interim orders passed by the High Court at Madras – Principal Bench that were subsisting as on 20th March, 2020 may stand extended till 30th April, 2020 unless vacated or modified earlier or until further orders of the Court unless specifically dealt with by any judicial order to the contrary.
We find it appropriate to continue all interim orders which are operating till today and are not already continued by some other courts / authority including this court and the same shall remain in force till 30.04.2020, subject to liberty to parties to move for vacation of interim orders only in extreme urgent cases.
Asman investments Ltd. Vs DCIT (Gujarat High Court) Interest as per Interest Act will be charged on company irrespective of its main object whether it is Finance or not In the given case the appellant assessee filed return of chargeable interest on 29.1.2002 declaring chargeable interest at ‘Nil’. In the statement attached to the return […]
In the absence of failure on the part of assesse to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, the reopening of assessment beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year was without authority of law.
