Orissa High Court’s judgment rejecting Khageswar Patra’s anticipatory bail plea due to a failure to comply with Section 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)
Delhi High Court quashes the penalty order issued under Black Money Act, citing the department’s failure to consider assessee’s email.
Karnataka High Court provided directions/ guidelines for calculation of tax difference on contract value in respect of works contracts executed prior to 01.07.2017 under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and completed after introduction of GST i.e. after 01.07.2017
The case of ITO vs Saloni Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. revolves around the failure to file income tax returns in due time, an offence under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act. The directors of the company were sentenced to six months of rigorous imprisonment due to the late filing of their income returns for AY 2014-2015.
Delhi High Court orders reevaluation in Upinder Kumar Wanchoo vs ITO, stressing fair hearing and document review under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that department cannot ignore an order passed by the appellate authority merely stating that it proposes to file an appeal against the said order.
Delhi High Court held that order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without dealing with the request for accommodation and according without hearing the petitioner is in violation of principles of nature justice and hence liable to be set aside.
Calcutta High Court mandates re-evaluation of ETC Agro Processing’s time-barred IGST refund, overturning denial based on an unconstitutional notification.
Case between Jai Venktesh Concast Private Limited and the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, was heard by the Calcutta High Court. The writ petitioners filed an intra-court appeal against the order of the learned Single Bench, which directed them to pay 20% of the disputed tax for interim protection from recovery.
High Court of Gauhati, after examining detailed submissions, directs DGGI to produce original records in the court for inspection of the court to ascertain whether there was ‘reason to believe’ or was it a mere pretence.
