Bombay High Court quashes assessment order, directs JAO to provide specific information for Section 148A(b) notice. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
Bombay High Court’s landmark judgment nullifies Income Tax assessments for AY 2016-2017, citing improper sanction under Section 151(i) instead of Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Read the full text and implications.
Explore the detailed analysis of the Calcutta High Court’s landmark decision on GST penalties. Learn why automatic penalties under Section 129 are not upheld.
Delhi High Court orders re adjudication in Omkara Footwear case, challenging rejection of refund appeals for non-existent entity and delayed payment. Full judgment analysis.
Madras High Court directs Customs authorities to review representation of Jineshwar Enterprise regarding seized imported goods. Know details of court order.
Kerala High Court recently addressed the issue of levying GST interest and penalties for the delay in filing GSTR-3B after the cancellation of the Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN).
Madras High Court held that section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2021) is read down by removing the retrospective last date of 1st date of February, 2021 as 31st day of March, 2021. All applications even in respect of cases arising between 01.02.2021 to 31.03.2021 shall be deemed to be pending application for purpose of consideration by Interim Board for settlement.
Delhi High Court held that the Trade Notice no. 08/2023 dated 20.06.2023 issued by DGFT setting out the conditions of eligibility and procedure for allocation of quota for export of broken rice set aside. Further, respondent are directed to re-evaluate the criteria for allocation of quota for export of broken rice.
Madras High Court held that refund cannot be denied as refund application under section 54(1) of CGST Act was made within a period of limitation, however, supportive documents were submitted at the time of personal hearing. Notably, the time limit fixed u/s. 54 (1) is directory in nature and it is not mandatory.
Delhi High Court’s decision in ITA 1260/2018, addressing disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. Learn about the quantum, computation, and implications for Caraf Builders & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
