This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SCN not mention delayed payments or specify alleged non-existent dealer: HC Set-aside order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Omkara Footwear Through Its Proprietor Shyam Lal Bansal Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax And Another (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Omkara Footwear Through Its Proprietor Shyam Lal Bansal Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax And Another (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Against Omkara Footwear in GST Refund Dispute
Introduction: The Delhi High Court recently issued a significant judgment in the case of Omkara Footwear, challenging an order dated 10.12.2021, rejecting appeals against the Adjudicating Authority’s decisions on refund applications. The petitioner sought a refund of ₹18,00,202 for the period January to March 2020 under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the...
