Naresh Kumar Goyal Vs National Faceless Assessment Center & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Naresh Kumar Goyal (Petitioner) challenged the show cause notice and the draft assessment order both dated April 19, 2021, penalty notice dated May 20, 2021 (Notices) and the assessment order dated May 20, 2021 (Impugned Order) passed by the Department. The Petitioner […]
Exemption under Section 54 of the Act is dependent on the date of acquisition of the property and not on the date of payment made in respect of such property. It is also noteworthy to mention that to claim an exemption under Section 54F of the Act, it is not necessary that the same sale consideration should be used for construction of a new house property.
Zahoor Ahmad Bhat Vs Hirdesh Kumar (Jmmu And Kashmir High Court) The Division Bench judgment of this court dated 29.4.2021 passed in WP(C) No. 669/2021 connected with WP(C) No. 777/2021 inter alia provides as under: i) That a vehicle once registered in any state of India, shall not be required to be registered elsewhere in […]
G. Santhosh Kumar Vs State Of Kerala (Kerala High Court) The Kerala High Court, in major relief to Ex Assistant Tax Commissioner, G.Santosh Kumar ruled that the criminal proceedings can not be initiated against a Public Servant for passing incorrect quasi-judicial order or against the government. The petitioner, G.Santosh Kumar who was the assessing authority […]
GST : Where Charitable Trust was running a medical store, even though Charitable Trust was giving medicines to customers at a lower rate with no profit, sale of medicine by Trust would be a taxable supply of goods; aggregate turnover exceeding threshold limit, Trust would have to obtain registration
The provisions of Section 42 can only be invoked in a situation where the mismatch is on account of the error in the database of the revenue or a mistake that has been occasioned at the end of the revenue. In a case where the claim of ITC by an assessee is erroneous, as in this case, then the question of Section 42 does not arise at all, since it is not the case of mismatch, one of wrongful claim of ITC. As far as the levy of interest on belated cash remittance is concerned, it is compensatory and mandatory and the levy is upheld to this extent.
Sahil International Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) 1. Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that despite enforcement of the amended Income Tax Act, 1961 with effect from 01.04.2021, the Respondents purport to invoke repealed provisions of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act without following provisions of amended Act, issuing notice dated 07.06.2021. […]
Orissa Stevedores Ltd. Vs Union of India And Others (Orissa High Court) 1. The challenge is that the order is violative of the principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given to the Petitioner. 2. Figures of the taxable income and demand for AY 2018-19 in the impugned assessment order of the […]
International Management Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) 1. The basis of addition was not furnished to the petitioner. He emphasizes that no draft assessment order was issued which is mandatorily required under the Faceless Scheme. 2. In a similar case being Smart Vishwas Society vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Earlier National […]
The petitioner has imported a prestigious costly Car from England. But, unfortunately not paid the Entry tax as per the Statutes. He filed a writ petition in order to avoid payment of Entry tax for the Car imported from England. The petitioner, who is a reputed Cine Actor, is expected to pay the tax promptly and punctually.
