Seema Gupta Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 30th June, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) and the consequential notice dated 30th June, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act for the Assessment Year […]
HC held that electricity generated from Waste Gas cannot be classified under chapter heading 2716 and hence, cannot be said to be exempted goods, since not excisable goods so as to warrant reversal of credit
Held that appellant has transferred the land to the developer through JDA and the developer had power to alienate their portion of property. Accordingly, property so transferred is not subject to wealth tax.
Held that services are supplied to Foreign Telecom Operators and hence place of supply of service will be location of service receiver as per section 13(2). Provisions of section 13(3)(b) are not attracted as the services are not provided to the individual.
Delhi high court negating dept stand about retrospective amendment plea for sec 14A explanation added by finance act 2022 in authors opinion it should ably address the much created confusion from revenue side.
Delhi High Court admitted a petition through which two adjudication orders based on a single show cause notice was challenged. Also held that no coercive measures will be taken against the petitioners, in pursuance of the aforementioned adjudication orders.
Held that the department cannot proceed against a person found liable to prosecute him for the offence under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without sanction under section 278B.
Held that information available on the social media platform of petitioner shows that the event were conducted. Petition dismissed giving liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority.
HC held that any adjudication order is non-est in the eye of law if the same is passed without issuance of proper show-cause notice being dehors principle of natural justice.
Order of cancellation of registration was set aside by Tribunal and, therefore, direction was issued to assessing officer to assess assessee as a trust and not as AOP
