Calcutta High Court held that an arbitrator cannot shun away his responsibilities and leave the work of quantification of awarded interest on chartered accountant. Accordingly, held that arbitration award suffers infirmity.
Sheetal Dilip Jain Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court held that minimum 30 days time should be granted to file reply in all cases of issuance of SCN under Section 73 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It will equally apply to Section 73 and 74 […]
Section 30 of the Advocates’ Act confers the right on the Advocates to practice. The same does not confer any right on any advocate to park his/her vehicle inside Court premises. There is no element of public interest involved in this petition. The petition is misconceived. In the result, the same is dismissed.
Keshav Kanshkar A Class Electrical Contractor Vs Principal Secretary Department of Energy (Madhya Pradesh High Court) ‘Precedent’, refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar issues. ‘Precedent’, is incorporated into the doctrine of ‘stare decisis’, and requires courts to apply the law […]
Liability of a partner for acts of the firm. Every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a partner.
Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (Andhra Pradesh High Court) A perusal of material on record would show that GST refund application came to be made by the petitioner was on 22.09.2021, for the Tax period May, 2018 to May, 2019. Though, learned Government Pleader would contend that the said […]
HC held that, GST Notice which failed to mention allegations of fake invoices against assessee is not valid and warned department to strictly give proper training to officers.
Telangana High Court held that the court can extend the timelines of One Time Settlement Scheme (OTS) on examination of the facts therein and also satisfying the reasons mentioned therein by the loanee.
Karnataka High Court held that there is no prohibition under the Employees Compensation Act for blood relatives to be employer and employee.
Delhi High Court held that considering the limited scope of judicial review u/s. 34 of the Arbitration Act, court cannot modify the arbitral award by awarding interest to the appellant.
