Himachal Pradesh High Court held that stamp duty/ registration fee not leviable on conversion of public limited company to private limited company.
Punjab & Haryana High Court held that in the present GST evasion case the investigation stands concluded and the investigation agency has failed to lead any pre-charge evidence even after passing of almost 6 months. Bail granted.
Delhi High Court held that duty drawback has been paid to the exporter, but, until now, sale proceeds have not been received against exports, the deeming provision incorporated in the second (2nd) proviso to Section 75 will kick in. Hence, duty drawback needs to be remitted.
Madras High Court held that turnover relating to the sale of alcoholic liquor sold in the restaurant is not to be included in the turnover of foods and drinks as sale of alcoholic liquor is taxable separately.
Madras High Court directed the petitioner to file the pending GST returns thereafter the GST registration cancelled, on account of non-filing of GST return for continuous period of 6 months, will be restored
Madras High Court directed the petitioner to file the pending GST returns thereafter the GST registration cancelled, on account of non-filing of GST return for continuous period of 6 months, will be restored
Karnataka High Court directed restoration of GST registration as non-payment of GST and non-filing of GST return, on account of bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause du;u accepted
Jharkhand High Court decided not to interfere on issue of leviability of tax on work of transportation of coal under GTA services leviable at 12% under Chapter Heading No. 9965 or 18% under Chapter Heading No. 9986 at the investigation stage.
Madras High Court held that Supreme Court in the case of State of West Bengal vs. Calcutta Club Limited concluded that sales tax is not payable on any sale of goods in the form of food, refreshments and drinks including liquors by the club to its permanent members. However, petitioner needs to demonstrate that their case comes within the ambit of said judgement.
Delhi High Court held that addition on the basis of single seized document is unsustainable as no fresh material was taken into account by the AO for reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Act.
