Petitioner approached HC against order passed by appellate authority as GST Tribunal has not been constituted till date. Revenue contended that writ petition should not be admitted in wake of alternate remedy.
Errors committed are clearly inadvertent and, rectification would, in fact, enable proper reporting of turnover and input tax credit to enable claims to be made in an appropriate fashion by petitioner and connected assessees.
Chandra Developers Private Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Whether the commissioner could issue show cause notice when the discharge certificate has not been withdrawn by the designated committee, the enquiry was not initiated prior to 30.06.2019 (cut off date). The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay. The petitioner was a service provider. It […]
Kerala HC rules that Lok Ayukta lacks authority to override Sales Tax Officer’s orders. Case analysis of Additional Chief Secretary vs. Kerala Lok Ayukta.
Gauhati High Court held that order of Zimma petition is liable to be quashed as order was passed simply considering the submissions that areca nuts will be used for other purpose and not for human consumption without verifying genuineness of the claim.
Bombay High Court held that present case is not a case of lack of enquiry, however, it can be a case of inadequate enquiry. Accordingly, inadequacy of enquiry does not give jurisdiction to the CIT to invoke provisions of Section 263 prior to the insertion of Explanation 2.
Bombay High Court dismissed the present petition as petitioner has the option to file a statutory appeal to the Appellate Tribunal and there is no reason why petitioner cannot avail of the statutory remedy of appeal.
Suretex Prophylactics (India) Private Limited Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High Court held that as on the date of recovery, there was no order/ adjudication made by the department quantifying the amount of tax/ duty payable by the petitioner. Accordingly, recovery of such amount is without authority of law and liable to […]
Allahabad High Court held that when public servant himself makes a demand and demand is accepted by bribe giver and bribe is paid by the bribe giver, it is a case of obtainment under Section 13(1)(d)(i) and 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Sandeep Kabra Vs Bureau of Immigrations (Calcutta High Court) Whether suspended directors of a company who are guarantors can be restricted from travelling outside Country by a Bank by issuing lookout circular on account of being Willful defaulter? The Calcutta High Court in this case was considering the petitioners’ Writ application for travelling abroad to […]
