Madras High Court held that by including processes such as refrigeration, re-packing, polishing, labelling, re-conditioning repair, remaking, refurbishing, testing, calibration and re-engineering within the ambit of manufacture, the legislature clearly intended an expansive understanding of what constituted ‘manufacture’ for the purposes of ‘deemed export’.
In a case between Prakash Lal Khandelwal and CIT, Jharkhand High Court determined that a one-day delay in uploading an order or generating a DIN does not render an assessment order unsustainable.
Delhi HC In Shri Chhatter Pal & Ors. issued guidelines for mediators while drafting Settlement Agreements in cases of matrimonial disputes.
In the case of DRB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of West Bengal, the Hon’ble Kolkata High Court at Jalpaiguri has allowed release of machinery upon furnishing a bank guarantee. The petitioner, a contractor, challenged seizure’s legality, arguing against imposition of a penalty due to absence of an invoice.
Discover the recent ruling by the Delhi High Court quashing time-barred reassessment proceedings for escaped income below the mandatory monetary threshold.
Court dismissed the writ petition arguing that the impugned assessment order under Section 147 of the Act was, in fact, an appealable order, and had been passed providing extensive reasons.
Bombay High Court, the court held that a writ petition is not maintainable if filed purely on apprehension or proposed action.
Madras High Court directed provisional release of goods on the payment of enhanced customs duty. Further, directed that prayer for waiver of demurrage be addressed to appropriate respondent.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. The court quashes the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for violating principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Allahabad High Court held that once the registration is granted, the same could be cancelled only in terms of the conditions prescribed under Section 29(2) and allegedly being a bogus firm is not a ground enumerated under Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
