Explore Kapil Wadhwa vs. Samsung Electronics case, a Delhi High Court landmark decision on using third-party trademarks in meta-tags. Learn about its legal implications
Bombay High Court directs Senior Intelligence Officer and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to respond in a custom seizure case involving valuable gold bars and coins.
Madras High Court held that once the purchaser has purchased the property even after knowing about the encumbrances then it is his obligation to discharge the encumbrances. The Bank cannot file a writ petition so as to protect the interest of the third party, who has purchased the property knowing the fact that there are other encumbrances.
Delhi High Court held that a penalty of revocation of license for failing to collect the KYC forms unjustly restricts the Appellant’s ability to undertake the business CHA for the entire life. Accordingly, revocation of customs broker license set aside.
Calcutta High Court held that order of acquittal set aside as recorded on account of misreading of evidence. Evidence on record sufficient to hold respondent liable for committing offence u/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
Kerala High Court held that the property tax can be levied on the building which becomes capable of use for residential purposes or other purposes. Hence, municipality is entitled to recover the property tax only from the date of issuance of occupancy certificate.
Delhi High Court held that as per Section 38(3)(a)(ii) of the DVAT Act a pre-deposit does not partake the character of tax or duty, and hence Tax Department can neither retain the same nor could it utilize the same for adjustment purposes towards tax liability for different assessment years.
Calcutta High Court’s decision on GST tax liability for government contracts, both pre-GST and post-GST. Learn about relief and representation.
Explore Calcutta High Court’s interim ruling addressing GST tax liability for government contracts and its impact on ongoing projects. Learn more
Bombay High Court held that the provisions of the Civil Code could not create any right in a spouse, who is not registered shareholder of the company, by operation of law, in relation to other shareholders of that company including her spouse. Accordingly, beneficial ownership held by one spouse cannot be taxed on the basis of 50% to each.
