CESTAT Ahmedabad dismisses Natural Petrochemicals Pvt Ltd’s appeal, upholding Service Tax demand under Business Auxiliary Service and rejecting financial hardship claim.
CESTAT Delhi held that mere non-disclosure of the receipts in the service tax return would not mean that there was an intent to evade payment of service tax. Hence, demand invoking extended period of limitation unsustainable.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that when the agreement between the service provider and recipient is for a particular job and not for supply of man power, the activity cannot be classified under ‘Man Power Recruitment or Supply Agency Service’.
Discover how Dabur India Limited secured a favorable CESTAT Kolkata ruling. Learn why honey is not considered an exempted good and how Rule 6 of CCR does not apply.
Discover the CESTAT Mumbai decision in the I Gate Global Solutions Ltd. case. Learn why rebate claims for exported services require a clear correlation with FIRC.
CESTAT Mumbai upholds the rejection of a service tax refund claim by RJB Estate Pvt. Ltd. Find out why the claim was denied and the legal reasoning behind it
Learn why CESTAT Chennai ruled that appeals before the tribunal abate once the NCLT approves a Resolution Plan. Explore the case of Dhanalakshmi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Read how Posco India successfully secured a refund of wrongly paid anti-dumping duty in a case against C.C.-Kandla, as decided by CESTAT Ahmedabad. Learn about the legal implications.
CESTAT Kolkata directs re-adjudication of a live consignment pending without justiciable reasons. Full text of the CESTAT order regarding M/s IB Turbo Pvt. Ltd.
CESTAT Chennai held that non-payment of tax merely on the basis of bald statement of financial constraint without proving the same is not reasonable cause within the meaning of section 80 of the Finance Act. Accordingly, demand confirmed.
