EYGBS (India) LLP Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Banglore) CESTAT find that the impugned order has rejected the refund claims on the grounds that the appellant has violated the condition at para 3(III)(a), 3(III)(d) and Rule 5 of SEZ Notification No.12/2013-ST dt. 01/07/2013. Further, I find that the appellant has SEZ units as well […]
Maa Santoshi Tobacco Co. Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) I find that only for not finding the statutory register being RG-I and Form-4 at the time of inspection by the Officers of DGCEI, adverse inference have been drawn without reference to the records of the appellant available with the Department, being […]
SA Impex Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) When the provisions require that only one claim has to be filed for each quarter, definitely, an assessee has to file one claim only at the end of the quarter. Thus, the limitation cannot be counted from the day of LEO or the […]
Rayban Sun Optics India Pvt . Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Apparently and admittedly, the appellant filed the refund claim on 19.02.2018. The refund was claimed on an amount as was deposited by him during investigation and which was ordered to be appropriated vide Order-in-Original dated 21.10.2004. No doubt the […]
Explore the CESTAT Chennai case of T.G. Silks vs. Commissioner of Customs, addressing late fee charges during the GST transition. Uncover technical challenges, system defects, and the waiver possibility under Notification No. 26/2017.
Ramesh Kumar Agarwal Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Central GST (CESTAT Delhi) Coming to the plea of issue being barred by time, I hold that no doubt the service tax was deposited by the appellant on 4th October, 2016 and 24 October, 2016 and the refund claim has been filed on 7th May, 2018 […]
Nilkamal Limited Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The Revenue having collected per force the Service Tax along with interest, the appellant is pushed into a situation where its refund claim is denied and even the credit of Service Tax so paid is also not allowed to be availed, with the introduction […]
Lenovo India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Hon‟ble High Court of Madras in the case of M/s. Hewlett Packard Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Customs & ors. reported in 2020 (10) T.M.I. 970 – Madras High Court has held that the proviso to Section 149 contemplates an opportunity to […]
Penalty on confiscated Gold Jewellery was not liable to be imposed as the transit passenger was not required to pass through customs barrier or check post and the source of gold jewellery he was wearing was cogently explained, which had not been found to be untrue.
Explore the Shanti Construction Co vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot case with CESTAT Ahmedabad. Delve into the nuances of service tax, Cenvat credit, and retrospective exemptions.
