Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Service Tax on Liquidated Damages for Poor Material Quality: CESTAT remands case back to Adjudicating Authority

February 26, 2021 762 Views 0 comment Print

We find that the facts are not in disputed that amount recovered by the appellant is towards the poor quality of goods purchased by them.

Service Tax demand on MRSA cannot sustain for the period prior to 16.5.2008

February 24, 2021 846 Views 0 comment Print

ld. Counsel for appellant has also raised an argument that the demand under MRSA cannot sustain for the period prior to 16.5.2008 when the transactions of the very same nature have been subjected to service tax under Information Technology Software Services after such services became taxable. It is to be stated that ITSS is not a category carved out of MRSA.

Regulation 10(n) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations not mandates physical verification

February 23, 2021 5388 Views 0 comment Print

Transpeed Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Regulation 10(n) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 requires the Customs Broker to verify the correctness of Importer/Exporter Code Number, Service Tax Identification Number, identity card of the client and functioning of the client at the declared address by using reliable, independent, authentic documents, data […]

CESTAT explains Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules related to reversal of CENVAT Credit

February 22, 2021 12360 Views 0 comment Print

he appellants were not maintaining separate records of receipt, consumption of inventory of inputs and input services in terms of Rule 6(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and therefore, they opted to pay CENVAT Credit as determined under Rule 6(3A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 in terms of Rule 6(3)(ii) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

No service tax liability on license fee and other fee for grant of liquor license

February 18, 2021 7599 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Bangalore, in M/S. Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 20374 of 2020, decided on February 18, 2021] held that no service tax under reverse charge mechanism is payable on the license fee and other application fee paid to the State Excise department for grant of liquor license. Further, confirmed the Service tax demand on Storage License fee for CO2 which the Appellant is liable to pay along with interest.

CESTAT referred matter back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication on request of Appellant

February 15, 2021 780 Views 0 comment Print

Learned Counsel pointed out that there are 28 contracts in respect of which demand has been made. Learned Counsel stated that they have paid the service tax in respect of Serial Number 14 and 20 of the said list and these are not disputed. Learned Counsel pointed out that they are entitled to get the benefit of the mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20 June, 2012. He pointed out that Serial Number 12(d), Serial Number 13(a) and Serial Number 14(a) of the said notification cover all the contracts that they have undertaken as these contracts are in respect of the canals, roads and railways etc. He pointed out that the availability of exemption under Serial Number 13(a) and 14(a) could not be taken up before Commissioner due to lack of proper representation by the Advocate. He pointed out that they are entitled to these benefits but the Commissioner‟s order only examine the benefits with respect to Serial Number 12(d) of the said notification. He pointed out that in order to get a proper redressel, the matter needs to be sent back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication for examining the relief under all the related entries of the mega Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20 June, 2012.

Service Tax: No penalty in absence of allegation of fraud, mis-representation, etc.

February 15, 2021 2781 Views 0 comment Print

In order to attract Section 78, it is necessary that tax must have remained unpaid for the reasons of fraud or collusion or wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, etc, with an intention to evade payment of tax.

Refund of excess Service Tax paid & Shown in TRANS-1 can be claimed after reversal

February 11, 2021 2769 Views 1 comment Print

Pujan Builders Engineers & Contractors Vs C.C.E. & S.T. Vadodara-II (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The facts in the present case is not under dispute that the appellant have paid the excess service tax during the quarter April to June, 2017, however, the appellant under bona fide belief transferred the said excess paid service tax into their TRANS-1 […]

Section 11B Limitation period for refund of tax starts from date of reversal

February 11, 2021 1890 Views 0 comment Print

Pujan Builders Engineers & Contractors Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The facts in the present case is not under dispute that the appellant have paid the excess service tax during the quarter April to June, 2017, however, the appellant under bona fide belief transferred the said excess paid service tax into their TRANS-1 as […]

Service Tax Demand cannot be raised in category for which SCN was not issued

February 10, 2021 4764 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner was not justified in confirming the demand of service tax under the category of ‘works contract’ for the period post June 1, 2007 even if the levy of service tax was not exempted under Notifications, since, the show cause notice that demand it service tax under the three categories namely (i) commercial or industrial construction, (ii) construction of complex and (iii) management, maintenance or repair.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031