Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Unjust enrichment cannot be assumed merely on presumptive basis

February 22, 2022 2034 Views 0 comment Print

Rambagh Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Appellate Authority/ Commissioner (A) has not given any finding which may falsify the findings of original adjudicating authority. Commissioner (Appeals) has been silent about CA certificate. Thus, I opine that Commissioner (Appeals) has committed an error by holding the refund to hit […]

No service Tax on Lease of Wagons to Railways when effective control rest with Railway & VAT/Sales Tax already paid

February 21, 2022 2118 Views 1 comment Print

MSPL Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in mining and sale/export of iron ore and are registered with service tax department. The appellants have availed ‘own your wagon scheme’ introduced by Indian Railways by purchasing and leasing out […]

SCN issued on Directors cannot be treated as SCN issued on Company

February 21, 2022 1926 Views 0 comment Print

Yug International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) It is a fact that the show cause notice was not issued to the appellant. It was issued only to five persons including Amit Agarwal, who is the Director of the appellant. The appellant has stated that since it was not required to file reply to […]

CESTAT allows refund of pre-deposit along with interest

February 21, 2022 9102 Views 0 comment Print

Vandana Global Ltd. Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) The appellant had paid the amount of pre-deposit at the rate of 10% of duty and penalty while filing appeal before the CESTAT over and above the 7.5% thereof as was paid while filling appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) against Order-in-Original No.115/Refund/AC/RD-I/2017 dated 10.04.2018 pursuant to the Show Cause […]

Service tax cannot be demanded on amounts incurred by HO towards salaries of Branch employees

February 20, 2022 2070 Views 0 comment Print

Cades Digitech Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) We find that the amounts incurred by the head office (HO) towards the salaries etc. of the employees working in their branches can by no stretch of imagination be equated to any service rendered to them by the respective branches. We find that in […]

Refund of Service Tax collected twice by department cannot be rejected on limitation ground

February 20, 2022 1854 Views 0 comment Print

Suraj Forwarders & Shipping Agencies Vs Principal Commissioner of GST & CE (CESTAT Chennai) The facts narrated as above establishes that service tax has been paid twice by the appellant for the very same taxable value. Though the department agrees that the earlier payment made by challan dated 05.01.2015 on the service tax registration number […]

Cenvat Credit Refund cannot be denied on Transition to GST

February 20, 2022 6189 Views 0 comment Print

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) In this case here is no allegation raised by the department that the appellant is not eligible to avail credit of the duties / taxes paid on the inputs / input services. To put it more clearly, the appellant would be eligible […]

HSN mentioned by supplier is just a base, imported goods can be classified under any other appropriate HSN

February 20, 2022 5415 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner of Central Excise And Customs Vs Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. (CESTAT Hyderabad) Facts- The assessee imported various equipment from Reliance Infra Projects and Zhejiang and cleared them by filing 36 Bills of Entry (BOE) with the Customs at Kakinada. BOE filed in the Customs EDI system are either marked to an officer for assessment or […]

Service Tax not payable on risk/gold loan/additional interest merely because it’s shown as incidental charges

February 18, 2022 1734 Views 0 comment Print

Kosamattam Finance (P) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Coming to the question as to whether the appellants are required to pay service tax on the risk interest/interest on gold loan/additional interest shown as incidental charges before October 2008, it is not disputed that the appellants are a NBFC and […]

Publicity not required for availing benefit of Exemption Notification No. 88/88-C.E.

February 18, 2022 351 Views 0 comment Print

SAC Industry Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) The tenor of the Show Cause Notices, inter alia, that the name of the Women’s Society does not figure in any of the statutory documents, does not figure in the website of Sabari Soaps, that the labels and packing do not contain […]

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031