Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Prasar Bharati Cannot Retain Service Tax Collected From Customers when no tax was actually chargeable

March 14, 2022 1752 Views 0 comment Print

Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Vs Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi (CESTAT Delhi) In the present case, it is true that no service tax was chargeable on the activity of the appellant, viz., carrying the advertisements in its broadcast and telecast. Therefore, the Government cannot collect service tax. It is also true that Section […]

Refund short allowed – CESTAT Directs dept to consider inadvertent error of Appellant

March 14, 2022 549 Views 0 comment Print

Tata Consumer Products Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)  From a perusal of the impugned Order-in-Appeal, I find that though the appellate authority has taken note of the claim of the appellant as regards the inadvertent/clerical error, but has not accepted on the ground that the same was not brought to the notice […]

No penalty for import of drugs and cosmetics if competent authority issued NOC for release goods after inspection

March 14, 2022 1950 Views 0 comment Print

Beverly Hills Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) After considering written submission of the appellant, the Adjudicating Authority vide impugned order has held that the appellant had attempted to clear goods imported vide Bill of Entry No. 6374054 dt. 14.05.2018 through non-notified ICD/ Port in violations of the provisions contained in Rule […]

Cenvat Credit from 01.04.2011 on Rent-a-Cab, supply of Manpower for Outdoor Catering/Gardening Services

March 14, 2022 1296 Views 0 comment Print

MTL Instruments Private Limited Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The definition of input service was amended with effect from 01.04.2011 which has been reproduced in paragraph 5.1 above. The definition contains an exclusion clause wherein the credit availed on Rent-a-Cab Services as well as Outdoor Catering Services has been specifically excluded. […]

section 114 of Customs Act not attracted if dept fails to prove that appellant has abetted the offence

March 13, 2022 4473 Views 0 comment Print

Hera Shipping Solutions Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) In order to attract section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962, the department has to establish some act or omission by which the appellant has abetted the offence. Brief facts are that the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit gathered specific intelligence that […]

Excavation & removal of over burden & mining of ore falls under Mining Services

March 12, 2022 2397 Views 0 comment Print

Associated Soap Stone Distributing Company Pvt Ltd Vs C.S.T. Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case, the issue to be decided is that the service in question is classifiable under the category of Site Formation and clearance, Excavation and Earth Moving and Demolition service as contended by the revenue or under the category of […]

Central Excise Act, 1944- Purchase & Sale includes transfer between two sister units

March 12, 2022 2340 Views 0 comment Print

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & GST (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Counsel for the appellant has mentioned that they had purchased a generator set in the year 2004 which was used by them at their Jaipur plant. After 12 years of its use, since the Jaipur plant got closed that the said […]

Section 65(105)(zzza): Works contract service not include Electric winding of motor

March 11, 2022 1635 Views 0 comment Print

Sahni Electric Works Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Undisputedly Electric motor winding job required both winding of the motors and also using the materials required for such service. Thus, it was a composite works contract which involved both rendering service and supplying material. The Revenue also does not dispute that it is a […]

CHA liable for penalty for allowing misuse of license by lending it to unscrupulous persons

March 11, 2022 3279 Views 0 comment Print

R.S. Arunachalam Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) These appeals are filed against the orders passed by Commissioner (Appeals) who set aside the order passed by original authority and remanded the matter to reconsider the non-imposition of penalty on the appellants under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. M/s.R.S. Arunachalam is the Customs Broker […]

Prior to issuance of DGFT Notification dated 18/12/2019, gold was freely importable

March 11, 2022 1365 Views 0 comment Print

Rajesh Exports Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) As per the Notification dated 18/12/2019, it has been held that after issuance of the Notification dated 18/12/2019, only Nominated agencies can import the gold with end use condition which otherwise means that prior to issuance of the Notification dated 18/12/2019, the gold was also freely […]

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031