CESTAT Ahmedabad emphasizes the importance of evidence in rejecting bill of entry values in Deeplalit Enterprise P Ltd Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad case.
CESTAT Bangalore clarifies that the ‘Let Export Order’ date is crucial for determining the customs duty rate on exports, impacting refund claims.
CESTAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minebea Intec, waiving customs penalty post voluntary duty payment before SCN issuance. Detailed insights here.
CESTAT Bangalore rules against UDL Logistics for not verifying exporter’s rep, imposing penalty. Full analysis of the case provided.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in Asia Shipping Services vs. C.C.-Kandla case, dropping penalty for dual CHA licenses due to procedural lapses. Detailed analysis provided.
CESTAT Chennai clarifies the application of Section 27(1B) limitation for refund claims on duty paid under protest, aligning with legal precedents.
Read about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co Operative Ltd Vs C.C. Kandla, allowing amendment on bill of entry u/s 149 of Customs Act before final assessment.
Rishu Enterprise vs. CGST & Excise: CESTAT Kolkata rules service tax demand unjustified solely on Form 26AS. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
CESTAT Kolkata overturns charges against Sharda Rerollers for alleged clandestine removal, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in such cases.
CESTAT Chandigarh ruled that advisory support service relating to software falls under the purview of service by software engineers, exempt from service tax. Details here.
