CESTAT Chennai held that as per Section 73A(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 monies collected as a tax, even if wrongly done, has to be deposited to Government.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that merely because by an agreement a right is confirmed on the party to the sale of goods or service undertaken was not ipso-facto bringing the agreement within the ambit of the franchisee.
CESTAT Chennai order in Vikram Trading Company and Commissioner of Customs -Why enhancement of imported goods’ value without proper reasons not sustainable.
Exploring the CESTAT Chennai decision in Nanda Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs on granting 6% interest for 253-day delay in customs duty refund.
Explore the details of the case Bhagwati Power & Steels Ltd. Vs Commissioner decided by CESTAT Delhi. Understand the verdict on the allowance of Cenvat Credit for installing an SMS Plant under modernization and renovation clauses.
A detailed analysis of CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling in favor of Nexteer Automotive India over the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. Learn why the show-cause notices were quashed.
Understand the value of tools and dies includable in the assessable value of excisable goods with the recent ruling on this case by CESTAT Ahmedabad.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside confiscation, fines, and customs duty demands against Benign International due to a lack of CLRI report. Read for comprehensive analysis.
CESTAT Chennai rules that Kadri Mills (CBE) Ltd. is not liable to pay tax on banking charges deducted by foreign banks. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the judgment.
CESTAT Kolkata order in Rajib Saha Vs Commissioner of Customs. Learn how CESTAT quashed the differential duty demand Without Challenging Original Bills of Entry Assessment on PPC Cement imported from Bangladesh.
