CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes Central Excise duty demand on petroleum fuels extraction, citing absence of a speaking order. Detailed analysis and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad allows CENVAT credit for the supplier of Rotogravure Printing Cylinders who had paid excise duty correctly. In-depth analysis of the case.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses the Customs department’s appeal due to its failure to prove delay in receiving the order from the Review Cell. Detailed analysis of the case.
Read the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order in Vidyut Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman, where excise duty demands, interest, and penalties are deemed unsustainable due to a mere wrong mention of registration in payment.
CESTAT Bangalore quashes penalty under Section 112A of Customs Act on undervaluation of artificial flowers and photo frames due to lack of corroborative evidence. Analysis of the case.
CESTAT Bangalore rules in Rafeek K.T. vs Commissioner of Customs case: Retracted statements without corroborative evidence deemed inadmissible.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules on CENVAT credit eligibility. Intas Pharmaceuticals allowed to claim credit based on law at service receipt, not credit availing date.
Explore CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision in Archna Traders vs. C.C.E. & S.T. on denial of VCES Scheme benefit under Section 106 of Finance Act 2013. Full analysis here.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes the rejection of a refund claim on Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid for shoe imports, citing non-inclusion of an allegation in the show cause notice.
CESTAT Kolkata case – Mishra & Mishra (Agency) Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Customs. Learn how CHA licenses cannot be revoked without direct involvement.
