CESTAT Kolkata ruled on Emami Paper Mills Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, addressing issues of PSIA certificates, penal liabilities, and re-examination of goods.
Understand the CESTAT Mumbai order on absence of speaking order under Section 17(5) of Customs Act. Detailed analysis, implications, and conclusion.
Read about CESTAT Hyderabads ruling on the classification of Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh by Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. under Central Excise Tariff Act. Understand implications and decisions.
Explore CESTAT Mumbai’s order on IBM India vs Commissioner of Customs, disputing classification of Optical Transceivers under Customs Tariff Item 8517 6290 for duty exemptions.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that royalty and license fees are not to be added to the transaction value of imported parts in the case of Commissioner of Customs Vs Humboldt Wedag India.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Kolkata order on A.S. Chattha Exim Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs. The tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims for Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported goods.
CESTAT set aside demand of service tax on amounts received as booking cancellation charges, price difference & corporate discount, interest on income tax refunds, warranty claims (parts), procurement charges for volume discount
CESTAT Bangalore held that that service tax on commission paid to foreign commission agents is payable under reverse charge only from 18.04.2006 and not from 01.01.2005.
CESTAT quashes service tax demand against Yatra Online Pvt Ltd, ruling that convenience and cancellation fees are not connected to business promotion.
Under Regulation 10(n), a Customs Broker is not responsible for continuous client surveillance. Once address verification is done, any client’s address change without informing authorities isn’t the broker’s fault.
