Case Law Details
Case Name : Nandram Vs Garware Polyster Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Rasu Sharma
Employee Aggrieved By His Termination Can Move Labour Court Where He Had Been Employed Or Where The Company Headquarters Is Located: SC
A. Brief Facts of the Case:
A.1 In this case, a supervisor (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant“) was emplo
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Mostly an MNCs. having various manufacturing units at various locations and at various States.
Workers who are aggrieved by the action of the Management cannot approach the corproate h.q. or H.O. jurisdiction. Hon. Apex court rightly rules that the PLACE OF WORK is the jurisdiction apart from the Company H.O. .It should be noted that the workers who are aggrieved cannot afford to go from pillar to post. The Place of work should be the jurisdiction as righly decided by hon. Apex Court. Poor worker in the present case cannot be expected or afford to travel to Aurgabad for his legal case all the way.