Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandram Vs Garware Polyster Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rasu Sharma

Rasu SharmaEmployee Aggrieved By His Termination Can Move Labour Court Where He Had Been Employed Or Where The Company Headquarters Is Located: SC

A. Brief Facts of the Case:

A.1 In this case, a supervisor (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant“) was emplo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. DrGopinath Vedula says:

    Mostly an MNCs. having various manufacturing units at various locations and at various States.
    Workers who are aggrieved by the action of the Management cannot approach the corproate h.q. or H.O. jurisdiction. Hon. Apex court rightly rules that the PLACE OF WORK is the jurisdiction apart from the Company H.O. .It should be noted that the workers who are aggrieved cannot afford to go from pillar to post. The Place of work should be the jurisdiction as righly decided by hon. Apex Court. Poor worker in the present case cannot be expected or afford to travel to Aurgabad for his legal case all the way.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31