Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Explore key corporate tax proposals for Union Budget 2024-25: lower tax rates, new incentives, and rationalized TDS to boost growt...
Income Tax : Explore the intriguing history of Calcutta's film industry pre-1947 and the income tax challenges faced by iconic artists, offerin...
Income Tax : Explore Budget 2024 expectations on resolving tax implications for goodwill in corporate reorganization. Analyzing legal amendment...
Income Tax : Explore the ongoing issues of tax rebate under Section 87A for short-term capital gains on shares, following the new utility relea...
Income Tax : Explore controversy surrounding Section 87A of Income Tax Act and its impact on short-term capital gains. Learn why rebate was sud...
Income Tax : Explore India's impressive economic growth, government initiatives, and the challenges ahead in sustaining development through str...
Income Tax : आयकर पोर्टल की तकनीकी गड़बड़ियों के कारण करदाताओ...
Income Tax : The CBDT awards the Taxnet 2.0 project to Bharti-Airtel Ltd, enhancing the IT Department’s digital infrastructure with secure, r...
Income Tax : Faulty Income Tax Return (ITR) Filing Utility are currently enforcing incorrect income tax liability by not allowing legitimate cl...
Income Tax : Addressing glitches in ITD portal, the Association of Tax Lawyers requests an extension for the ITR filing deadline due to signifi...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court quashes IT order against Triton Overseas for jurisdictional issues under Section 148A(d). Learn about the Cour...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai removes penalty imposed on Sunil Bhagwandas Vorani (HUF) as addition was made on estimation basis, not due to concealm...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that income of non-resident is not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s. 195 as amount paid is covered in exc...
Income Tax : Read the full text of ITAT Ahmedabad's order where the delay in filing an appeal by the assessee was condoned due to CA negligence...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court rules on jurisdiction of JAO to issue reassessment notices under faceless assessment, impacting Income Tax Act S...
Income Tax : Discover the key update in Income Tax Notification No. 71/2024, which extends the compliance deadline from March 31, 2024, to Marc...
Income Tax : Read about Income Tax Notification No. 65/2024 dated 18th July, 2024, amending provisions under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, ...
Income Tax : Discover the latest amendment in Income Tax Notification No. 64/2024, extending the deadline to March 31, 2025. Learn about its im...
Income Tax : CBDT extends tax exemption deadline under Section 10(23FE) to March 31, 2025. Read the full details of Notification No. 63/2024 an...
Income Tax : Explore Notification No. 62/2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, amending Income Tax Act provisions effe...
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (iii) of clause (44) of section 2 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby authorises every Gazetted Officer of the Government of West Bengal appointed to perform the functions of a Certificate-Officer under clause (3) of section 3 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 (Bengal Act III of 1913), to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery Officer under the Income-tax Act, 1961
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies Bharatiya Bhasha Parishad, Calcutta, for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 1990-91 to 1992-93 subject to the following conditions, namely
It is hereby notified for general information that the institution mentioned below has been approved by the Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, the prescribed authority for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 6(iv) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, under the category of “Association” in the area of other natural and applied sciences, subject to the following conditions :—
In a civil suit the respondent obtained a decree against his employer the appellant company for a sum which included com- pensation for wrongful termination of his service, arrears of salary, interest and costs of the suit, and then applied for execution of the decree.
Y. Narayana Chetty Vs. ITO (Supreme Court) The notice prescribed by section 148 cannot be regarded as a mere procedural requirement. It is only if the said notice is served on the assessee that the ITO would be justified in taking proceedings against the assessee. If no notice is issued or if the notice issued is shown to be invalid, then the proceedings taken by the ITO would be illegal and void – Y. Narayana Chetty v. ITO [1959] 35 ITR 388 (SC); CIT v. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi [1967] 66 ITR 147 (SC); CIT v. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala [1971] 82 ITR 821 (SC).
Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as.
The question arising for consideration both in the reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act as well as in W.P. No. 925 of 1955 are identical and relate to the proper rule to be applied for determining the amortisation of films for computing the income, profits and gains of the assessee which is carrying on business as a film distributor. The assessee in the Reference Case No. 27 of 1955 is the petitioner in the writ petition.
In pursuance of the direction of this Court under Section 66(2), Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 143 of 1950, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, has submitted the statement of case on the following question of law : “Whether on the material on record the Appellate Tribunal could reasonably come to a finding that the sum of Rs. 8,500 was an income undisclosed sources ?”
An assessment under section 23(3) of the Act cannot be made only on bare suspcion. An assessment so made without disclosing to the assessee the information supplied by the departmental representative and without giving any opportunity to the assessee to rebut the information so supplied and declining to take into consideration all materials which the assesses wanted to produce in support of his case constitutes a violation of the fundamental rules of justice and calls for the powers under Art. 136 of the Constitution.
CIT v. S Sen & Others (Orissa High Court) 17 ITR 355 (Orissa) The proceeding arises out of two application consolidated because of the facts being identical, by the Commissioner of Income-tax/Excess profits Tax, Bihar and Orissa, under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 21 of the Excess profits tax Act for the stating a case and a case stated for the opinion of this Court on the following three question of law :-
