Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Unlock global trade success with the IEC code. Learn its legal significance, role in customs clearance, financial transactions, an...
Excise Duty : Explore the constitutional issues surrounding the Central Government's Excise Duty collection from September 2016 to June 2017. Un...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Learn how to navigate SAMAY Dashboard efficiently as a Chief Commissioner/Commissioner or ADG/DG. Streamline order management, upd...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai allows Bhor Industries' appeal, addressing unjust enrichment and duty refund issues from 1970-1982. Remanded case fo...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that substantive benefit of the appellant cannot be taken away merely because the refund claim is filed under Ru...
Excise Duty : Explore the CESTAT Delhi ruling allowing cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in cement manufacturing. Full text and expert a...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai upholds refund claim for Goa Golf Club Pvt Ltd, dismissing the appeal by the Customs Department. Learn about the key...
Excise Duty : In a significant decision, CESTAT Chennai quashes excise duty on 'Black Sand', ruling it as waste, not a dutiable product. Explore...
Excise Duty : Central Excise Notification 20/2024 revises duty rate to Rs. 2100 per tonne effective from August 17, 2024, under the Central Exci...
Excise Duty : Notification 19/2024 reduces Special Additional Excise Duty on petroleum crude. Effective from August 1, 2024. Read the full detai...
Excise Duty : Explore the latest changes under Notification No. 18/2024-Central Excise by the Ministry of Finance, affecting excise duties effec...
Excise Duty : CBIC revises monetary limits for adjudicating show cause notices in Central Excise for commodities under Chapter 24 of Schedule IV...
Excise Duty : Explore Notification No. 17/2024-Central Excise by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Detailed amendments, effective fr...
Circular No. 522/2000-CX It is directed to say that, as you are aware, the scheme of levy of excise duty based on capacity of production under section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in respect of hot steel re-rolling mills and induction furnace units is being, discountinued w.e.f., 1st April, 2000. Accordingly, Notification No.24/97(NT), dated 25th July, 1997, 30/97(NT), 31/97(NT), 32/97(NT), 47/97, 48/97, 58/97, all dated 1 August, 1997, are being rescinded w.e.f. 1st April, 2000.
G.S.R. (E). In exercise of the powers conferred by section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Central Excise Rules, 1944
Circular No. 521/17/2000-CX It is directed to refer to the issue of classification of Turmeric Powder sold in small tin containers etc. and using brand names. It has been reported that some of the field formations purpose to classify the product under Chapter 33.04 as cosmetics.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Central Excise Rules, 1944
Circular No. 520/16/2000-CX Of late, it has come to the notice of the Board that where an adverse CEGAT order pertains to more than one assessee, the concerned Commissioner sends proposals for C.A. only in respect of one party without checking up as to whether C.A proposals are being made in respect of other parties covered by the order or not. This discrepancy has been seen even in case of parties belonging to the same Commissionerate or the same zone
Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that according to a practice that was generally prevalent regarding levy of duty of Excise (including nonlevy thereof) under section 3 of the Central Excise Act, of 1944(1 of 1944) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), duty of excise on aerated waters prepared and dispensed by vending machines falling under Chapter heading no. 2201.20 or 2202.20 of the Schedule to the Central Excise
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 to 1944), the Central Government having satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 6/2000-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2000, namely:- In the said notification.
G.S.R (E). In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of section 2 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) read with rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby invests the Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow with the powers of the Commissioner of Central Excise
Circular No. 519/15/2000-CX It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the copies of Civil Appeals alongwith para-wise comments and brief facts of the case in respect of appeals filed by the parties in the Hon’ble Supreme Court are received very late in the Board from the Commissionerates. As a result filing of counter affidavit is delayed and in number of cases parties are able to get ex-party stay from Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Circular No.518/14/2000-CX Recently the Southern Bench of CEGAT vide its final Order 1786/99 dated 21.7.1999 in the case of M/s TVS Suzuki had held that provision of unjust enrichment under Section 11B cannot be invoked in the cases of refund where assessments were provisional under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules before insertion of proviso to sub-rule 9B in June, 1999
