Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Welspring Universal Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Welspring Universal Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

CESTAT Delhi held that substantive benefit of the appellant cannot be taken away merely because the refund claim is filed under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 instead of Rules 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Facts- The appellant, an EOU, is engaged in manufacture of welding machine tools/accessories. As an EOU, it was also registered as a private bonded warehouse u/s. 58 and 65 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant exported goods under claim of rebate. The rebate claim was allowed

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31