Delhi High Court sets aside CCI’s order, ruling that penal interest can’t be imposed without following proper procedure. Detailed analysis of Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs Competition Commission of India.
Gujarat High Court’s judgment clarifies the 12% GST levy on mango pulp. Analysis of the case Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.
In Tvl. B.L. Collection Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Madras High Court allows contesting GST demand due to cancer diagnosis, requiring 10% pre-deposit. Full judgment included.
Section 107(11) provides wide-ranging powers to the appellate authority to modify orders passed under Section 130(2) by the adjudicating authority. It emphasized that as long as the appellate authority’s decision is based on relevant considerations and is not manifestly unjust or unreasonable, the court has limited scope to interfere with its discretion.
Explore the implications of jurisdictional issues in tax assessment with the case of YKM Holdings Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, assessing the validity of section 143(3) assessments without proper notices under section 143(2).
Kerala High Court mandates uniform bail conditions for accused in a money laundering case. No prior sanction needed for travel abroad. Full text judgment included.
Read detailed analysis as Kolkata ITAT removes unexplained cash credit addition in Sharda Ferro Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT case. Share capital scrutiny under section 68.
Madras High Court directs 10% pre-deposit in GST proceedings due to notices uploaded in additional tab, not communicated to petitioner. Full text of judgment/order included.
CESTAT Chennai rules re-determination of UAE car value using Australian prices invalid without contemporary imports. Full text of the CESTAT Chennai order.
Despite the possibility of a previous copy being served, the court upheld the petitioner’s right to access the necessary documents by mandating the provision of a certified copy.
