Explore Himachal Pradesh High Court’s judgment favoring Ultra Tech Cement’s claim under the Budgetary Support Scheme, analyzed with key insights and legal implications.
Madras High Court directs appellate authority to reconsider GST appeal despite a 19-day delay due to the director’s illness, ensuring justice in M/s.A.R. Metallurgicals Pvt. Ltd.
The order under GST law must offer a personal hearing if requested or if adverse tax proposals are made. Failure to do so invalidates the order.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of DN Solutions, allowing depreciation claim on excess amount paid over net asset value. Learn about the detailed judgment.
CESTAT held that the appeal’s duty amount is below the Rs.50 lakh threshold per CBIC’s 02.11.2023 circular. Thus, the appeal was dismissed, leaving any legal questions open.
It is settled that once CA certificate is produced and in absence of any allegation of fraud or collusion, such certificate is sufficient to grant SAD refund claim. Refund should not be denied merely on technical violations.
The Supreme Court ruled that a Hindu female must have both possession and acquisition to claim full ownership of undivided joint family property. Read the detailed analysis.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai’s decision on payments to retiring partners by Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP. Understand why it’s not considered income under tax law.
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s verdict granting deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) to Grand Paradi Co-op Housing Society, clarifying co-op banks as cooperative societies in banking business.
Court clarified that an Advance Ruling is only binding on the applicant and jurisdiction that issued it, not on third-party taxpayers or other jurisdictions.
