Dive into the analysis of Kuoni Travel India Pvt Ltd vs Pr. Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) case where the court emphasized identifying specific services and consideration received for levying service tax.
Rajasthan High Court clarifies that high courts cannot entertain appeals on determination of excise duty rates or value of goods for assessment.
ITAT Bangalore overturns PCIT’s directive to disallow 80P deduction without proper claim, emphasizing lack of error prejudicial to revenue.
Twinings Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT: ITAT Kolkata allows gratuity payment as salary expense u/s 37(1) of IT Act, rejecting disallowance u/s 36(1)(v).
In a case between Sree Gokulam Food and Beverages Pvt Ltd and the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, CESTAT Chennai rules that MRP-based assessment applies only to mineral water and aerated water, not packaged drinking water.
Read the detailed analysis of the Principal Commissioner of Customs vs. Aptar Pharma India Pvt. Ltd. case by CESTAT Delhi regarding the classification of a lotion dispenser pump under CTH 84248990.
In Hemant Taneja Vs State Of U.P. case, Allahabad High Court overturns GST penalty, citing proper documentation provided by petitioner. Analysis & implications discussed.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of Allahabad High Court in the case of Gaurav Enterprizes Vs State of U.P. and Another regarding GST liability under Section 74.
Read the full judgment/order of Allahabad High Court in Sanjay Sales Agency Vs State of U.P. challenging GST penalty under Section 129(1)(b). Penalty quashed, fresh order directed.
Explore the legal intricacies of a bail application filed under Section 439 of CrPC in connection with a GST fraud case. Detailed analysis of arguments and court decisions provided.
