Fortigo Network Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the instant case, both the additions, i.e., addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Act and sec.68 of the Act relate to the share premium amount, i.e., both the additions arise out of common issue only. The assessee has also filed certain additional evidences. We earlier […]
Exposure Draft of Initial Application of Ind AS 117 and Ind AS 109- Comparative Information – Amendments to Ind AS 117, Insurance Contracts
Non-Appointment CS – penalty reduced – company is suffering from continuous losses and loss for the financial year 2021-22 was Rs. 5.99/- Crores and accumulated losses of Rs.19.74/- Crores, the accumulated losses is more than the paid up share capital, thus resulting negative net worth of Rs.1.74 Crores
Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, Bongaigaon, has reported that there is no record of the vehicle and there is also no proper document to support transportation of goods by the said vehicle as indicated by the petitioner in his petition as well as in the complaint. That being so, whatever papers submitted by the petitioner to prove the genuineness of his GST payment appears not only to be incorrect, but false also.
Indusind Bank Limited Vs Simarjit Singh (Supreme Court of India) In July 2006, the respondent-complainant, Simarjit Singh had availed a loan of Rs. 13,50,000/- from the appellant, IndusInd Bank Limited for financing a truck. The loan was repayable in equal monthly instalments of Rs. 35,150/-. The respondent committed default in payment of three instalments due […]
Gogad Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur) dmittedly and undisputedly, the assessee chose to be un-represented before the NFAC on as many as three occasions. However, the fact does remain that the NFAC did not adjudicate on the merits of the case but dismissed the assessee’s appeal before it on the ground that there […]
Massive Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) In this case Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order without hearing the assessee and not on merits there is a violation of Natural Justice. Therefore, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to the file of the […]
Siddharthshankar Sharma Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) The grievance of the petitioner that he was denied the facility of a vaccination for failure to produce an Aadhar card has also been dealt with in the counter affidavit. It has been stated that the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare addressed a […]
Considering the fact that cases of coal theft and carrying coals without GST, etc have become so common that unless such offences are thoroughly investigated, it will cause huge loss to the State exchequer. To unearth the fact of the case and to see the nature of involvement of the petitioner, custodial interrogation is necessary.
DCIT Vs J. P. Iscon Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) The brief facts leading to the case is this that the assessee had given inter-corporate deposit to six subsidiaries companies namely Dhanlaxmi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Amit Intertrade Pvt. Ltd., Dhwani Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Rich Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Gujarat Mall Management Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Palitana Sugars Mills […]
