There is no prohibition for the NRI for accepting the gifts from the relatives. In the absence of any prohibition, no adverse inference can be drawn against the assessee based on the prevailing system in the society.
Stella Maris Church Malpe Vs ITO (Exemptions) (ITAT Bangalore) We notice that the date of hearing of the appeal i.e. 23.12.2021 was announced on the earlier occasion on 6.11.2021. On that day, the counsel of the assessee Smt. K. Soumya, Advocate has taken note of the date of hearing and hence there was no necessity […]
Suzuki Suiting Pvt. Ltd. Vs I.T.O (ITAT Ahmedabad) Admittedly, the difference in the price of the share issued by the assessee and its fair market value and calculated and certified by the C.A. is barely 1% of its total value. The difference being Rs. 2.81 against the share value of Rs. 200/-, it is meager […]
United Spirits Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Taxes (CESTAT Bangalore) CESTAT find that the adjudicating authority has confirmed the demand in respect of various fees paid to the State Government in respect of manufacture, import and sale of alcoholic liquor. The adjudicating authority, though dropped the demand on licence fee, but confirmed the demand on […]
Lokhandwala Construction Industries Private Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) In this case, during the original assessment proceedings, a notice dated 19th October 2019 was issued under Section 142(1) of the Act by which petitioner was called upon to furnish copies of Index II(s) of three flats sold during the year. Petitioner responded by its […]
Infosys Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) This stay petition is filed by the assessee seeking extension of stay granted by the Tribunal in SP No.83/Bang/2021 dated 29.10.2021 against the outstanding demand of Rs.1029,20,96,950 for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The ld. AR submitted that the extension of stay was earlier granted by the Tribunal in […]
Canara Housing Development Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that advances given for purchase of land in the normal course of business of carrying on real estate development, if not recoverable could be allowed as either trading loss u/s 28 of the Act or as expenditure u/s 37 of the Act. In fact, the […]
Delhi HC reviews GST Act conditions for bail in Amit Gupta vs. Directorate case. Focus on ITC availing, reversal, and compliance with bail terms.
Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 15 of the said Act shall not apply to a banking company for a period upto 31st March, 2026, in so far as it relates to the treatment of unamortised expenditure on account of enhancement in family pension as set out in the Reserve Bank of India circular
Delhi HC sets aside exparte order in Ankit Kaul’s case due to technical glitch. Directs the respondent to refile and pass fresh assessment order within six weeks.
