Stay informed about the withdrawal status of ₹2000 banknotes in India. Learn about the process, deadlines, and the impact on circulation. Get the latest updates here
In the Rajendra G. Parekh vs ITO case, ITAT Mumbai restricts additions to 0.05% of gross total, questioning the handling of bank accounts and involvement in bogus business activities.
Bombay High Court quashes assessment order, directs JAO to provide specific information for Section 148A(b) notice. Detailed analysis and implications of the judgment.
Explore the Supreme Court judgment on Commissioner of Customs vs. Godavari Drugs Ltd. as it dismisses the customs appeal, citing increased monetary limits according to the CBIC Circular.
Explore frequently asked questions on the SOP for inspection of establishments by EPFO. Get insights from related circulars, guidelines, and implementation processes
GST AAR Rajasthan ruling on Deepak Jain’s commercial property lease clarifies GST implications on residential dwellings, emphasizing actual use over designation.
Delhi High Court’s decision in ITA 1260/2018, addressing disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. Learn about the quantum, computation, and implications for Caraf Builders & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Patna High Court restores appeal dismissed under BGST Act, setting aside delay grounds. Conditions outlined in Notification No. 53 of 2023 must be met.
It’s pivotal to note that the Customs Officers are not clothed with authority and power to decide on and declare the title of the properties of any kind. This point becomes a crucial aspect of the Defense’s argument, questioning the competence of the authorities making assertions on ownership.
Explore the CESTAT Chandigarh’s decision favoring Liberty Group Marketing Division in quashing service tax demands related to ‘Franchise Service’ for footwear manufacturing and distribution. Dive into the analysis of the agreement, the definition of ‘Franchise,’ and the crucial issue of limitation. Get insights into the legal arguments, precedents, and the CESTAT’s conclusion on this noteworthy case.
