Read the Madras High Court judgment on recovering dues from a liquidated company. Explore the legal implications and steps to approach the Liquidator before pursuing Directors
The court concluded that there was no violation of natural justice, especially as the petitioner chose not to respond to any notices. The assessment order was deemed valid, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioner retaining the right to explore other legal remedies available.
Explore the Allahabad High Court’s judgment on UP VAT Act, emphasizing turnover enhancement and rejection of account books. Key legal insights provided.
Kerala High Court nullifies Income Tax order against Anna Aluminium Company, citing violation of natural justice due to disregarding video conferencing hearing request. Full text of judgment included.
Read the Kerala High Court’s judgment annulling Income Tax Act Section 148A(d) order against Dinesh Dinakaran Pillai. Learn about the case and the court’s decision.
The crux of the petitioner’s argument rested on the alleged non-receipt of notice for the appeal hearing. Despite providing a postal address for their counsel, the petitioner claimed neither the counsel nor they received any intimation. The court, however, refuted this, emphasizing the automated system in place. Notices were not only uploaded on the portal but also sent via email and SMS alerts in real-time, using the details provided by the assessee.
The court emphasizes that the petitioner received eight notices under Section 142(1) and two show cause notices under Section 144. Despite ample opportunities, the petitioner did not respond or seek extensions. The court concludes that the petitioner cannot now claim a violation of natural justice, as there was substantial compliance.
Explore the Kerala High Court’s decision in the case of Global Plasto Wares vs. Assistant State Tax Officer. Analysis of penalties under Section 73(11) of CGST/SGST Act and implications for businesses.
Delhi High Court affirms women’s right to be Karta in Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Analysis of landmark judgment, societal perceptions challenged. Read more.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai order in the Devang Jitendra Mashru vs ITO case for AY 2010-11. Uncover the addition under section 69 and the final opportunity granted due to transaction information absence.
