Ms. Sachi Sarees Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) There is no law which prohibits a person to work in more than one partnership firms and draw remuneration therefrom. All that Section 40(b) requires is that the remuneration should be paid to a working partner and there is no prohibition either in the Income-tax Act, 1961 or […]
In re Sabre Travel Network India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that the entire gamut of activities of the Appellant is in the nature of the composite supply, of which intermediary services is the principal supply. Further, as regards the services provided by the Appellant to their Client, […]
In re Rohan Coach Builders (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In respect of the question raised by the applicant we hold that on fabrication of bus body on the chassis to be supplied by the OEMs (Principal) on delivery challan or any other owner of the chassis on which bus body will be fabricated by collecting […]
In order to further boost participation in Debt Market and based on representation received from market participants, in partial modification of the abovementioned SEBI circulars, it has been decided to revise the structure of charges for debt securities as defined in SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008, as given below:
Risk-based capital and net worth requirements for Clearing Corporations under Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations) Regulations, 2018
CBIC amends Notification Nos. 20/2015-Central Excise and No. 21/2015-Central Excise both dated 08.04.2015 to incorporate procedure for utilisation of paperless MEIS and SEIS scrips MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 01/2019-Central Excise New Delhi, the 9th April, 2019 G.S.R. 294(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central […]
Observing that allegations regarding evasion of tax, against person engaged in the business of hallmarking, can only be with reference to its business activity, Kerala High Court has held that seizure of the gold jewellery, belonging to petitioners but seized from the premises of the hallmarker, was not justified. The Court also observed that goods entrusted by principal, with hallmarker, and covered by delivery challan, cannot be subject matter of confiscation order under Section 130 of the CGST Act, passed in relation to the hallmarker.
DCIT Vs Ernet India (ITAT Delhi) Though assessee was charging subscription as well as consultancy fees on actual, the same did not result in to the conclusion, that it was carrying on its activities which could be termed as business, trade, or commerce. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT The present appeal has been filed by revenue […]
Pr. CIT Vs Khaitan Chemicals Ltd. (Rajsthan High Court) HC observed that the issue of classification of income on the sale of shares as business income or as short-term capital gains is to be decided the facts of each case. The tests to be applied for such determination is provided in CBDT Circular No.4 of […]
Office Order No. 82 of 2019 The following transfer/ posting in the grade of Income Tax Officer, on mutual basis, are hereby ordered, as per the table given below, with immediate effect or until further orders:
