Parvatiya Plywood (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessee filed its return of income through e-mode on 30.09.2012 declaring NIL income. It is recorded by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has claimed deduction u/s 80IC of the Act, amounting to Rs.34,49,325/-. In respect of statutory notices, Ld.AR of the assessee attended the assessment proceedings. […]
Devinder Gupta & Sons (HUF) Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi) It is an admitted position that the assessee had taken loan from the lender in the earlier years, a part of which has been repaid during the year albeit in cash. The amount of loan has been consequently reduced. A confirmation whereof from the lender has […]
Parthiv V Dave Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT find that the exporter has made a serious offence by mis-declaring the quantity i.e. against 30,000 pairs declared in the export document only physical quantity found 405 pairs. Moreover, the value was also shown exorbitantly high. I find that though the appellant has acted as CHA and […]
Guidelines for reimbursement of late fee payable and deposited under Section 47 by registered taxable person under Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the period from April 2021 to March 2022.
In re JCP Agro Process P Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) In case of purchase of tobacco leaves/bhukko from the agriculturist, the applicant is liable to pay GST on RCM basis at 5% [2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST] in terms of[Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017], Sr. No. 109 of Schedule I. Applicant is liable […]
The erstwhile MVA Government had announced the Amnesty Scheme for waiver of tax, interest and penalty payable under the MVAT and allied laws and the period was from 01/04/2022 to 30/09/2022.
Ratnawat Infra Construction Company LLP Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Situation which arises in this particular type of business of developing real estate, the CBIC have considered and have clarified that the developer/builder is entitled to service tax credit on cancellation of bookings, wherein the builder have refunded the amount of booking […]
It is observed that the resolutions placed before the Board during the aforesaid financial year for the purpose of bank signatory did not contain the specimen signatures of the authorized signatories and as such were also not contained in the Minutes book which indicate that minutes of the board meeting held on 29.08.2016, 27.10.2016 and […]
Once it is found that rectification application u/s 254(2) of I. T. Act, 1961 has been submitted within a period of four years from the date of actual receipt of judgment and order passed by tribunal, which is sought to be reviewed, petitioner is entitled to relief.
D. Murali Mohan Patanaik Vs Secretary to Government of Odisha (Orissa High Court) Under Rule 142 (1A) and (2A) of the OGST Rules, it is open to a person against whom a demand is raised to make a ‘partial payment’ and also to ‘file any submissions against the proposed liability’ in Part-B of Form-GST DRC-01A. […]
