Where notices were issued to assessee under Section 263 after his death notice could not have been validly served upon assessee, therefore, said notices are invalid and liable to quash. Assessment order framed under dead person is also liable to be quashed.
Government securities issued by the Central Government excluding Treasury Bills shall be eligible for lending/borrowing under a GSL transaction.
Galaxy Construction and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal relates to levy of penalty under the provisions of section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The penalty was levied by the Assessing Officer in respect of addition made under the provisions of section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. It is an […]
Petitioner was surprised that jurisdiction had been shifted from Bhubaneswar to Balasore and he accordingly filed an objection on 10th March, 2016.
Laviosa Trimex Industries Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Appellant is a CHA and they have issued the invoices showing the description as Custom House Agency Service Charges. Therefore, there is no dispute that the services on which the refund claim was made is indeed CHA Service. Moreover, even if any other service […]
Assessee has established on record that it had receipts from sale of agricultural produce, only because some invoices relating to sale are not available, assessee’s claim cannot be More so, considering reasonable quantum of sale proceeds.
Mehrul Industries (India) Vs Union Of India (Rajasthan High Court) Central Excise Act and the rules framed thereunder, do not contemplate extension of time beyond the period of limitation for entertaining applications for refund of duty and interest rebate claims, which have to be submitted within a period of one year as stipulated under Section […]
CBDT directs DGIT (Systems), New Delhi, to furnish the response to TN Govt in the form of flag based on Taxpayers status F. No. 225/169/2022-ITA.II Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes ***** New Delhi, the 16th February, 2023 Order under section 138(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act,1961 Central […]
Komatsu India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) It is not the case of the Revenue that what the appellant claimed was the refund of the duty paid and there is also no dispute that the appellant claimed only the security deposit made. The Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s. […]
Pass an order to respondents to ensure effective income tax regulation on sale of personal cars in order to prevent misuse of tax regulations like: (a) In addition to PAN card, a copy of last return filed should be made mandatory for purchasing a personal car. [b] Withdraw tax benefit for second car to companies or professionals.
