HC allows petitioner to demonstrate that tractors/trailors against which exemption of motor vehicles tax are claimed are not used or do not ply in public road but are confined only within the tea garden area.
HC held that penalty imposed for violation of Section 53(1) of TVAT Act, 2004 suffers from lack of proper notice and absence of reasonable opportunity of being heard
MCA has issued Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Second Amendment Rules, 2023. Amendment introduces provisos to Rule 4 of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016. These provisos impose requirements on companies seeking to file removal applications, including the submission of overdue […]
Manturi Shashi Kumar Vs Director (Telangana High Court) Facts in the present appeal lie within a narrow As already noted above, appellant No.1 was an accused in the criminal case for offences which are considered as predicate offences under PMLA. In view thereof, a case was registered under PMLA following which the properties mentioned above […]
Allahabad High Court noted that against the order dated 21.05.2022 passed u/s 74 of GST Act, 2017, the appeal could have been filed within a period of 30 days, which was extendable for one month and no more.
CESTAT observe that pre-delivery inspection charges are includible in the assessable value when such pre-delivery inspection is mandatory and an essential condition for the sale of the goods
Assessee continued to be granted the exemption under Section 12A of the Act. It is the case on behalf of the appellant that till 1987 there was no requirement of issuance of any certificate of registration of Section 12A and only filing an application for registration under Section 12A and processing the same by the Department was sufficient.
Adjudicating Authority has not committed any error while holding that Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be invoked to sanction the refund of unutilized Cenvat credit lying with the appellant much prior to April, 2017 that too in cash as per Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017.
An application has been filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi for permission to utilize Rs.500 crores of Environment Compensation Charge (ECC) Fund towards the payment of Delhi -Meerut RRTS project.
CIT(A) was not right in levying interest under Section 234A of the Act when the return was filed under Section 148 itself and therefore, the interest should be charged from the date of notice under Section 148 of the Act itself and not from the date of return filed under Section 139 or it is due date under Section 139.
