On the GST side an analysis of e-way bill data reveals encouraging trend about revival of our economy. The value of supplies of goods, which had reduced to ahout 10% of Pre-lockdown period of March 2020 in Lockdown 1.0, has now reached more than 80% of pre-lockdown level during first Fortnight of June 2020.
It is submitted that Computer Emergency Response Team-India (CERT-In) has issued an advisory regarding a potential cyber offensive attack from the Chinese Army. In the guise of a Free Covid-19 Test,
Further Extension of time till 30th September 2020 to creation of deposit repayment reserve of 20% u/s. 73(2)(C) of the Companies Act 2013 and to invest or deposit 15% of amount of debentures u/r.18 of Companies (Share capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 vide General Circular No. 24/2020 Dated: 19th June, 2020. Requirement under section 73(2)(c) […]
The Respondents are directed to permit Petitioner to upload TRAN-I on or before 30.06.2020 and in case Respondent fails to do so, the Petitioner would be at liberty to avail ITC in question in GSTR-3B of July 2020.
Case No. ADD-SSR 12/2019 Sunset Review of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of ‘Measuring Tapes’, originating in or exported from China PR.
Shri Kamal Nayan Singhania Vs Elegant Properties (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) In this case Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,42,369/- during the period of investigation. Therefore, this Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of […]
Securities and Exchange Board of India Notice inviting comments on the recommendation made by High Level Committee under the Chairmanship of Justice A. R. Dave, Retired Judge, Supreme Court of India, on the Measures for Strengthening the Enforcement Mechanism of the Board and Incidental Issues. Dated the 16th June, 2020 1. The High Level Committee under […]
Since clause (i) section 92A was omitted with effect from 1st April, 2017 and the effect of such omission is that the said clause(i) was never existed in the statute. Hence, Ld. PCIT can not exercise the jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act.
CIT Vs NCR Corporation Pvt Ltd (Karnataka High Court) Whether the tribunal is correct on facts and in law in holding that ATMs and encoders are computers eligible for 60% depreciation even when they do not provide processing activity and do not contain all features of computers and such cannot be called as computers? It […]
Mitha Ram Vs State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Learned counsel however submits that out of 29 witnesses, only 01 witness has been examined till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner then submits that because of the present COVID-19 situation and also the fact that trial is likely to take some time, detention […]
