Demag Delaval Industries Turbomachinery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee had made provision for warranty of Rs. 2,76,18,000/-which was claimed as expenditure. The same was denied by the Assessing Officer on the ground that it is an unascertained liability and a contingent liability. Learned CIT(A) in principal upheld the action of the Assessing […]
Preludesys India Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Madras High Court) The first aspect that has to be considered is as to whether the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the concept of a ‘deemed export’. This position has been clearly explained by the High Court of Karnataka both in the case of Tata Elxsi Ltd., and in […]
Petition requesting to notify the GST rate of 5% for all varieties of fabrics falling under Chapters 50 to 63 of the Customs Tariff in furtherance of the recommendations made by the Goods and Service Tax Council
DCIT Vs. HDFC Sales Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Before us the ld. DR for the revenue in his submissions vehemently submitted that the projected estimation of the provisions of expenses is projected purely on estimation and that there is mismatch of projected figures of expenses and the actual expenses incurred on various counts, which we […]
Star Alloys & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT has held that in the case of GTA service, CENVAT credit is available, therefore extended period cannot be invoked. Learned Advocate submits that whatever service tax was payable by them on the said GTA services, the same was available as a credit […]
Sanghavi Movers Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra (Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Pune) Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal held that taking services of operating cranes from appellant to carry out work does not amount to ‘transfer of right to use’ the cranes. it held as follows:- i. VAT and CST levied by treating the transactions as transfer […]
EMC Software & Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. JCIT (ITAT Banglore) The assessee seeks inclusion of T2T2 India Ltd. The Ld. A.R. submitted that this company is functionally comparable company. The TPO/DRP has rejected the same only for the reason that the detail of Related Party Transactions (RPT) was not disclosed in the Annual Report. […]
Jain Shwetamber Murtipujak Sukrat Fund Kaoda Committee Vs. CIT (ITAT Indore) On perusal of the record we find that the assessee trust was incorporated in the year 1945 and even in the Permanent Account Number (PAN) allotted by the Income Tax Department the date of incorporation of the trust is 16.4.1945. The assessee has claimed […]
GMMCO Limited Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Madras High Court); The Madras High court held that is not possible to countenance the contention raised by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner in W.P. No. 949 of 2020 that the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Surya Roshni Ltd. -vs- Employees Provident Fund […]
DCIT Vs Manav Realty (ITAT Pune) It is evident from the reasons recorded by the AO that the initiation of reassessment proceedings was premised on the fact that the commencement took place at a date in variance with the one stated by the assessee in the original assessment proceedings. The ld. CIT(A) has aptly recorded […]
